|

Need
to upgrade your business continuity plan (BCP) or reduce contingency
planning costs?
Business continuity
plan (BCP) development tools are used
for setting recovery times and criticality as well as driving risk
treatment strategy and risk treatment projects. An examination of
your operational components
should result in the differentiation between critical and
non-critical operations and critical and non-critical components.
Operations or operational components may be considered critical if
the implications for stakeholders of damage to the organization
resulting from loss or unavailability of that operation or
operational component are regarded as unacceptable. Acceptability of
the estimated impact from disruption may be judged according to the
established risk appetite of the organization and the approved risk
policy. Risk treatment and risk treatment strategy are normally
identified with regard to the cost of establishing and maintaining
appropriate business or technical recovery solutions. An operation
or operational component may also be considered critical if dictated
by a regulatory or legal requirement. For each critical operation or
operational component that is considered to be within the scope of
the organizational resilience project, two important BIA values can
then be assigned:
-
Recovery Time Objective (RTO) - the
acceptable amount of time to restore the function.
-
Maximum tolerable period of disruption (MTPD)
– the maximum amount of time before the disruption will cause
significant and critical losses or damage.
-
Criticality value - establish how
important a component is to the business
|
 |
|
Business continuity plan BCP impact analysis & assessment
When
analyzing your business for the purposes of improving your BCP business
continuity plan it is necessary to identify and assess the likely impact
on the organization from potential disruptive events. Also known as
business impact analysis, this risk based process is often
considered to be a rather daunting procedure as it often involves
making a subjective assessment on disruptive events where the
severity can range from minimal to catastrophic. This lack of
clarity causes confusion and uncertainty and makes the process of
defining specific outcomes difficult and can be subject to many
disagreements about how an accurate result can be achieved. At long
last help is now available that removes much of the complexity and
establishes a workable and practical framework that is easy to
understand and implement. The BC Expert software outlined on this
website provides a simple methodology for achieving this and it
really works. |
|
Setting BIA priorities in your BCP business continuity plan
After defining and analyzing potential hazards and threats,
calculating and assessing the resultant impact scenarios that form
the basis of the response and recovery plan the development of a
series of relevant and formal plans is recommended. As a general
rule priorities for development of these plans should be based on
the criticality levels established through the impact analysis of
the potential incidents that could occur.
The
impact analysis (BIA) is the cornerstone of the contingency process.
|
|
BC Expert available in
three fully scalable versions:
Silver:
Risk,
BIA, BCP business continuity plan
(more)
Gold: BCP
business continuity plan for best
BCP practise
(more)
Platinum: Multi-enterprise
BCP business continuity plan
(more)
|
Using our business continuity plan (BCP) software to control your
recovery process
The first stage in the business continuity plan (BCP) development
process is to
identify the organization’s critical objectives.
This will cover all important products and
services created and delivered to the customers plus all critical
potential non-compliance items. These critical objectives will be
identified during the organization components mapping process which
should support detailed dependency setting and should create the
ability to cascade established impact values to all related
operations and operational components. Once these critical
objectives have been identified, it is necessary to identify a range
of measurable impact categories that relate to the organization.
Impact categories could include items such as financial loss; loss
of profit; environmental loss; or regulatory non-compliance etc. The User also establishes up to
five measurement periods for assessing impact from the moment that
the disruptive incident occurs. The business continuity plan (BCP)
software software includes a default
setting for these periods but they can be easily changed to match
the User’s needs. The User then assesses the impact on the
organization from the interruption to the critical objectives within
each period and this creates a recovery objective for the selected
item. These values are then cascaded through the mapped components
with adjustments for the level of dependency as set by the User.
This process results in clear and verifiable criticality values,
clear and verifiable recovery time objectives, and clear and
verifiable maximum periods of tolerable disruption
|